IT Human Resources research and best practice

Last updated: 28 March 2009

   

 

 

Further resources on resource planning and allocation:

Structuring the IT function (article)

Research Product 3009: Structuring the IT function

Analyst Note 7013: IT resource pools and resource managers: the reality

Analyst Note 7002: Managing freelance IT workers, or IT contractors

Analyst Note 7012: IT HR issues in India: what's going on?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Further resources on IT recruitment:

Analyst Note 7009: IT recruitment: what works best?

Analyst Note 7014: Converting freelance IT contractors to employee status

Analyst Note 7019: IT Career propositions for graduates: a critique

Resourcing and recruitment overview

This topic starts with IT resource planning, a difficult area if it is your ambition to plan for more than about six months ahead.

 

Resource planning

Diaz Research has seen many headcount forecasts provided by HR managers. Our experience is that these usually underestimate the actual IT headcount. This is true even when the forecast is only for a nine to twelve month look-ahead.

Headcount is of course only one aspect of resource planning: forecasting the numbers of particular skills is even more problematic. The problem is that to forecast headcount and skills accurately you first need a fixed plan of exactly what systems and system enhancements are needed in the year(s) ahead. That is not realistic in the real-world business environment.

The wise HR or planning manager will therefore avoid getting heavily involved in detailed bottom-up resources and skills forecasting systems. A broad brush forecasting approach, with a flexible approach to training and retraining works better.

 

Resource allocation

Resource allocation is of great interest to many IT and IT HR managers. Some see it very much in terms of efficiently deployment of people across multiple projects, where some form of dynamic allocation is needed to maintain high levels of employee utilization. Other see it as simply making sure that the resources are going to the right projects: those with the biggest business impact. A third group sees resource allocation in terms of developing people, and keeping people motivated.

But whatever the starting point the issues tend to be similar:

Who owns the IT resource?

How can we match our workstream and priorities to our resources?

What data do we need and what systems can help us?

There is a very wide range of approaches to this area. At one extreme is where the line manager 'owns' the worker, who can only move jobs by applying for an advertised internal vacancy, or perhaps by the intervention of their boss's boss. At the other extreme is resource pool working where a resource manager 'owns' the resources and lends them out for agreed periods to line managers or project managers; here, the resource manager does the performance review.

Some think these two options are the only options but in fact there is a vast range of other options or sub-options. These might include Skills Groups, Master Practitioners, Resource Allocation Managers and a host of other roles.

 

Recruitment

IT recruitment was very muted in the few years until 2005, when it recovered somewhat from the record lows of 2002-2004. But what are the current trends in recruitment?

The first trend is away from recruiting trainees. Trainee recruitment has recently recovered a little and we expect this recovery to continue but on the whole when IT functions recruit they tend to be looking for skilled people, not graduate trainees.

The second trend is towards online recruitment (e.g. job-boards), which our research tells us is a skill that many companies have yet to fully master. As recruitment levels build up it will be interesting to see whether the economics of using agents and job boards, sometimes quite inefficiently, will cause some companies to once again retain their own specialist IT recruiters.

Underlying this whole area is, however, a big question about the exact nature of the career proposition that is on offer to graduates. Our research has shown that many companies do not have a clear and credible proposition that stands up in the era of offshoring.

 

 

 

(c) 2002-2009 Diaz Research Ltd, London     Privacy      Contact us